PMI Project Management Professional PMP Practice Test - ITU Online IT Training
Service Impact Notice: Due to the ongoing hurricane, our operations may be affected. Our primary concern is the safety of our team members. As a result, response times may be delayed, and live chat will be temporarily unavailable. We appreciate your understanding and patience during this time. Please feel free to email us, and we will get back to you as soon as possible.
[th-aps]

PMI Project Management Professional PMP Practice Test

Share This Free Test

Welcome to this free practice test. It’s designed to assess your current knowledge and reinforce your learning. Each time you start the test, you’ll see a new set of questions—feel free to retake it as often as you need to build confidence. If you miss a question, don’t worry; you’ll have a chance to revisit and answer it at the end.

Exam information

  • Exam title: PMI Project Management Professional PMP
  • Exam code: PMP
  • Price: USD 555 (may vary by region)
  • Delivery methods:
    • In-person at Pearson VUE testing centers
    • Online with remote proctoring via Pearson VUE

Exam structure

  • Number of questions: 180
  • Question types: multiple-choice, multiple-response
  • Duration: 230 minutes
  • Passing score: 61%

Domains covered

  1. People (42%)
  2. Process (50%)
  3. Business Environment (8%)

Recommended experience

  • Three to five years of project management experience
  • Experience leading and directing cross-functional teams
  • Knowledge of project management methodologies and tools

NOTICE: All practice tests offered by ITU Online are intended solely for educational purposes. All questions and answers are generated by AI and may occasionally be incorrect; ITU Online is not responsible for any errors or omissions. Successfully completing these practice tests does not guarantee you will pass any official certification exam administered by any governing body. Verify all exam code, exam availability  and exam pricing information directly with the applicable certifiying body.Please report any inaccuracies or omissions to customerservice@ituonline.com and we will review and correct them at our discretion.

All names, trademarks, service marks, and copyrighted material mentioned herein are the property of their respective governing bodies and organizations. Any reference is for informational purposes only and does not imply endorsement or affiliation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the most effective best practices for implementing a comprehensive web application security strategy?

Implementing a comprehensive web application security strategy requires a multi-layered approach that addresses potential vulnerabilities throughout the development and deployment lifecycle. Best practices include adopting a security-first development mindset, performing regular vulnerability assessments, and utilizing security frameworks designed for web applications. Here are some of the most effective strategies:

  • Secure Coding Practices: Developers should follow secure coding standards such as OWASP Top Ten, avoiding common pitfalls like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), and insecure deserialization. Regular training on secure coding helps maintain awareness.
  • Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate all user inputs on both client-side and server-side to prevent malicious data from executing or injecting malicious scripts into the system. Use whitelisting where possible.
  • Use of Web Application Firewalls (WAFs): Deploy WAFs to filter and monitor HTTP traffic, blocking malicious requests and protecting against common attack vectors like SQL injection and XSS in real-time.
  • Implement HTTPS with Strong SSL/TLS: Encrypt data in transit to prevent eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks. Use up-to-date protocols and strong cipher suites.
  • Authentication and Authorization: Enforce strong password policies, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and role-based access control (RBAC). Regularly review access rights to ensure least privilege principles.
  • Regular Security Testing: Conduct vulnerability scans, static and dynamic application security testing (SAST/DAST), and penetration testing to identify and remediate weaknesses proactively.
  • Secure Deployment and Configuration: Harden server configurations, disable unnecessary services, and keep software/software dependencies up-to-date to patch known vulnerabilities.
  • Monitoring and Incident Response: Continuously monitor logs and network traffic for suspicious activity, and develop an incident response plan to handle security breaches efficiently.

By integrating these best practices, organizations can significantly reduce the attack surface of their web applications, improve resilience against cyber threats, and ensure compliance with industry standards and regulations. A layered security approach, combined with ongoing education and updates, is essential for maintaining a secure web environment.

What is the significance of OWASP Top Ten in web security, and how should developers utilize it effectively?

The OWASP Top Ten is a prioritized list of the most critical security risks to web applications, published by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). Its significance lies in providing developers, security professionals, and organizations a clear understanding of the most common and impactful vulnerabilities, enabling them to focus their security efforts effectively.

Understanding and utilizing the OWASP Top Ten is essential for developing secure web applications because it highlights vulnerabilities that are frequently exploited by attackers and pose severe risks. The list is regularly updated to reflect the evolving threat landscape, making it a vital resource for maintaining current security standards. Here’s how developers should effectively use the OWASP Top Ten:

  • Incorporate into Development Lifecycle: Integrate awareness of OWASP Top Ten vulnerabilities into every phase of the software development lifecycle, from design to deployment.
  • Secure Coding Practices: Use the list to guide secure coding standards, such as sanitizing user inputs to prevent injection flaws or implementing proper session management to prevent security misconfigurations.
  • Training and Education: Provide regular training sessions for developers on the specific vulnerabilities listed, including real-world examples and mitigation techniques.
  • Implement Security Testing: Use tools and manual testing to identify these vulnerabilities during development, such as static code analysis for injection flaws or dynamic testing for security misconfigurations.
  • Prioritize Remediation Efforts: Focus on fixing the most critical vulnerabilities first, especially those that are most commonly exploited or have the highest potential impact on data confidentiality, integrity, or availability.
  • Leverage Frameworks and Libraries: Use security-focused frameworks that address OWASP Top Ten risks, such as input validation libraries, secure session management, and Content Security Policy (CSP).

By systematically aligning development practices with the OWASP Top Ten, organizations can build resilient web applications that are resistant to common attack vectors, reduce security debt, and foster a culture of security awareness. This proactive approach not only mitigates risk but also enhances user trust and compliance with regulatory standards.

What are common misconceptions about Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks, and what is the reality?

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is one of the most prevalent web security vulnerabilities, but several misconceptions surrounding it can lead to underestimating its impact or misapplying mitigation strategies. Clarifying these misconceptions is essential for effective defense and accurate understanding of XSS threats.

Some common misconceptions include:

  • XSS only affects poorly coded websites: While insecure coding practices increase XSS risk, even well-secured websites can be vulnerable if third-party scripts, libraries, or user-generated content are not properly sanitized.
  • XSS is always a server-side problem: Although server-side validation is critical, many XSS attacks exploit client-side vulnerabilities, such as malicious scripts injected via input fields or URL parameters, emphasizing the importance of both client and server security measures.
  • Preventing XSS is solely about input sanitization: While input sanitization reduces risk, comprehensive XSS prevention also involves output encoding, setting secure Content Security Policies (CSP), and employing security headers.
  • XSS attacks are only about stealing cookies or session tokens: Although session hijacking is a common goal, XSS can be used for defacement, phishing, malware distribution, or facilitating other attacks like data exfiltration or privilege escalation.
  • All XSS vulnerabilities are equally severe: The severity depends on the context, such as the level of user privilege, the type of data exposed, and the attack vector. Reflective XSS might be less persistent, while stored XSS can have long-lasting impacts.

The reality is that preventing XSS requires a layered approach that includes input validation, output encoding, secure coding practices, and security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP). Regular vulnerability assessments and developer training are vital components of effective XSS mitigation. Recognizing these misconceptions allows organizations to implement more comprehensive security measures, reducing risk and protecting user data more effectively.

How does Content Security Policy (CSP) complement other XSS mitigation techniques?

Content Security Policy (CSP) is a crucial security layer that enhances protection against Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by restricting the sources from which scripts, styles, and other resources can be loaded and executed. While input validation, output encoding, and secure coding practices form the foundation of XSS prevention, CSP acts as a robust complementary mechanism to further reduce attack surfaces.

Here’s how CSP complements other XSS mitigation techniques:

  • Prevents Inline Scripts and Eval(): CSP can disallow inline JavaScript and the use of dangerous functions like eval(), which are common vectors for XSS payloads. Even if an attacker manages to inject malicious code, CSP restrictions prevent its execution.
  • Restricts External Resource Loading: By specifying trusted domains for scripts, images, styles, and other resources, CSP limits the attacker's ability to load malicious content from untrusted sources, significantly reducing the risk of external script injection.
  • Enforces Secure Content Delivery: CSP enforces strict content loading policies, ensuring that only approved scripts and styles are executed, which bolsters traditional security measures such as input sanitization and output encoding.
  • Mitigates Zero-Day and Unknown Vulnerabilities: While input validation may miss new or obscure attack vectors, CSP provides a last line of defense by blocking malicious scripts from executing, even if they bypass other controls.
  • Reduces Attack Surface: By limiting what content can be loaded and executed, CSP minimizes opportunities for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities, making it a proactive security measure.

However, it’s important to note that CSP should be configured carefully. Overly permissive policies diminish its effectiveness, while strict policies may break legitimate functionalities if not tested thoroughly. Combining CSP with secure coding practices, regular vulnerability scans, and user input validation creates a holistic security approach that substantially mitigates XSS risks and enhances overall web application security.

Cyber Monday

70% off

Our Most popular LIFETIME All-Access Pass