One ransomware event, one cloud misconfiguration, or one vendor outage can stop payroll, delay orders, and expose sensitive data. That is why IT risk management is a business discipline first and a technical activity second. This article shows you how to build a practical risk management program that identifies risks, scores them, assigns owners, applies the right response, and keeps leadership informed.
Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)
Discover essential risk management skills to identify, assess, and mitigate project risks early, ensuring project success and avoiding costly surprises
View Course →Quick Answer
IT risk management is the process of identifying, assessing, prioritizing, responding to, and monitoring technology risks so the business can make informed decisions. A formal program matters because outages, ransomware, cloud failures, and vendor issues can damage revenue, compliance, and customer trust. The most effective programs use a simple workflow, clear ownership, and regular review.
Quick Procedure
- Define scope by listing critical systems, data, business processes, and third parties.
- Assign owners for each risk decision, control, and remediation task.
- Identify risks from inventories, scans, audits, incidents, and stakeholder interviews.
- Score each risk by likelihood, impact, and business context.
- Choose a response: mitigate, accept, transfer, avoid, or monitor.
- Implement controls and track them in a risk register.
- Review risk continuously and report trends to leadership.
| Primary Goal | Reduce business impact from technology-related threats as of July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Core Workflow | Identify, assess, prioritize, respond, monitor as of July 2026 |
| Common Framework Reference | NIST Cybersecurity Framework as of July 2026 |
| Control Guidance | NIST SP 800 series as of July 2026 |
| Typical Deliverable | Risk register, risk matrix, and executive dashboard as of July 2026 |
| Best Use Case | Protecting revenue, uptime, compliance, and reputation as of July 2026 |
What IT Risk Management Means
IT risk management is the practice of deciding which technology risks matter most to the business and what to do about them. It is not just a security team activity. If a payment platform goes down for two hours, the business impact shows up in lost orders, support tickets, and customer complaints, not just in a security report.
A useful way to think about risk is to separate threats, vulnerabilities, and risks. A threat is something that could cause harm, such as ransomware or an insider mistake. A vulnerability is a weakness, such as an unpatched server or overly permissive cloud storage. A risk is the business exposure created when a threat can exploit a vulnerability and cause impact.
For example, an exposed storage bucket is not automatically a crisis. It becomes a business risk when the bucket contains customer records, financial data, or intellectual property. That is why context matters more than raw technical severity. A low-severity issue on a mission-critical system can be more dangerous than a high-severity issue on a lab machine that has no business value.
Risk is a business decision about uncertainty. The goal is not to remove every threat. The goal is to reduce exposure to a level the organization can tolerate.
Risk responses usually fall into five categories: fix, reduce, transfer, accept, or monitor. A patch may fix the issue. Network segmentation may reduce it. Cyber insurance may transfer part of the financial exposure. Leadership may accept a small risk when remediation cost is higher than the likely impact. A low-priority risk may simply be monitored until conditions change.
This approach supports business continuity, compliance, and resilience. The framework behind the process gives teams a common language so technical controls can be tied to business outcomes. For official guidance, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and NIST SP 800 publications are widely used references for structuring risk work.
Why IT Risk Management Matters to the Business
Bad things happen fast when technology risk is unmanaged. Ransomware can lock up file shares and domain controllers. A cloud outage can prevent sales teams from accessing CRM data. An exposed storage bucket can leak customer data to the public internet. A vendor failure can break payroll, identity, or payment processing without any change inside your own network.
Business impact is what makes these incidents matter. If payroll cannot run, employees do not get paid on time. If the order system is down, sales stop. If customer service cannot access records, call times increase and satisfaction drops. If regulated data is exposed, legal, reporting, and notification costs follow. That is why risk programs belong in the conversation with finance, legal, operations, and executive leadership.
In the U.S., the stakes are measurable. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks technology and information security occupations that continue to expand as organizations spend more on protection and governance. Industry research also reinforces the cost of poor preparation. IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach report shows how quickly incident costs can escalate when response is slow or controls are weak.
Risk management is not the same as issue tracking. Issue tracking records that something is broken. Risk management asks whether the issue can hurt the business, how badly, how soon, and what should be done first. That distinction matters when budgets are limited and leaders need to choose between patching one server, adding MFA, improving backups, or replacing a fragile vendor service.
Warning
If risk decisions are made only by IT staff, the business may underfund critical controls or overreact to low-value technical findings. Business owners must be part of the decision.
For organizations aligning risk with compliance, ISO/IEC 27001 and HHS HIPAA guidance are useful references, especially where regulated data, audit requirements, or breach notification rules apply.
How Do You Define the Scope of an IT Risk Management Program?
You define scope by deciding which systems, processes, data, and third parties are included in the program. The right scope is business-based, not just technically convenient. If a service outage stops revenue, the service is in scope even if it sits in a vendor’s cloud account or is managed by another department.
Start with the assets that matter most. That usually means customer-facing applications, identity systems, finance platforms, core infrastructure, and sensitive data repositories. Then include supporting services such as backup platforms, remote access tools, SaaS applications, and cloud workloads. If the system can affect uptime, confidentiality, integrity, or compliance, it belongs in scope.
Build scope from business impact
Business impact is the best filter. An internal file share used by one team may be lower priority than a vendor-hosted payment processor or a remote access gateway used by the entire workforce. This is why scope should include mission-critical services and not stop at the owned infrastructure list.
A simple inventory is enough to start. List the application name, owner, business purpose, data type, dependency chain, and restoration priority. That inventory becomes the backbone of assessments, control reviews, and reporting. It also helps avoid the common mistake of protecting what is easiest to see instead of what is most important to the business.
| High-Value Scope Item | Why it belongs in scope |
|---|---|
| Payroll system | A failure affects employee payments and legal obligations |
| Identity provider | An outage blocks access to nearly every application |
| Cloud storage with customer data | Exposure can trigger breach response and regulatory issues |
| SaaS collaboration platform | Can interrupt daily operations and remote work |
When scope is done well, the program is easier to manage and easier to explain. It becomes clear which risks are being tracked, which are out of scope, and why. That clarity is essential for consistency.
How Do You Build Governance and Ownership?
Governance is the structure that tells the organization who decides, who approves, and who is accountable. Without governance, risk findings pile up, remediation stalls, and nobody knows who can accept a risk. Ownership must be explicit for both the risk itself and the control used to address it.
Leadership should sponsor the program because risk decisions often require funding, policy changes, or business tradeoffs. IT and security teams usually own technical remediation. Business owners own the process or service that carries the risk. Compliance and legal teams help determine whether a risk has reporting, contractual, or regulatory implications.
A risk committee or steering group is often the simplest way to keep accountability moving. It can meet monthly or quarterly, review the top risks, approve acceptances, and track overdue remediation. If the organization is small, a standing review with IT leadership, finance, operations, and security may be enough. The key is regular decision-making, not another meeting for the sake of it.
Unclear ownership is one of the fastest ways to let risk grow silently. A risk that belongs to everyone usually gets fixed by no one.
Frameworks like COBIT and the NIST SP 800 series are useful when you need to define governance and control expectations. They help connect technical work to oversight, approval, and documentation requirements.
Which Framework Should You Use for IT Risk Management?
The best framework is the one your teams will actually use consistently. For many organizations, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is a practical starting point because it organizes security and risk work around clear outcomes rather than overly technical jargon. It is also flexible enough to support mature and immature programs alike.
NIST CSF helps teams think in terms of identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover. That structure maps well to risk management because it makes it easier to connect assessment results to control gaps and business recovery needs. The NIST SP 800 publications add more detailed control and governance guidance when you need it.
Frameworks matter because they create consistency. They give security, IT, audit, and business teams a shared vocabulary. Instead of arguing about vague “security issues,” teams can talk about control failures, business impacts, and remediation priorities in a repeatable way.
For organizations with compliance obligations, framework mapping is especially valuable. You can map a risk to a control, map the control to a requirement, and then report the result in business terms. That makes it easier to show why one remediation deserves funding before another. It also supports audits because evidence is organized rather than scattered.
Note
You do not need to implement every framework at once. Start with one reference model, define your program structure, and map additional requirements later if the business needs them.
The point is not to become a framework collector. The point is to use a framework to make risk management repeatable, auditable, and understandable.
How Do You Identify IT Risks?
Risk identification is the process of finding what could go wrong before it turns into an incident. The best programs use multiple sources, because no single source gives a complete picture. Asset inventories, vulnerability scans, incident reports, audits, vendor reviews, and stakeholder interviews all reveal different parts of the risk landscape.
Start with obvious sources. A vulnerability scanner may highlight missing patches, weak configurations, or unsupported software. Incident reports may show repeated login issues, backup failures, or frequent user mistakes. Audit findings can reveal policy gaps or control weaknesses. Vendor reviews can uncover single points of failure in outsourced services.
Use workshops and interviews to surface hidden risks
Technical data alone misses operational reality. A workshop with finance, operations, service desk, and application owners often reveals risks that tools cannot see. For example, a business unit may depend on a spreadsheet workflow that no one documented. That is a risk if a single person owns it and it contains critical data.
Common modern risk sources include ransomware, phishing, misconfiguration, insider error, and system failure. Cloud and SaaS environments add risks related to shared responsibility, API exposure, and third-party availability. Remote work tools and VPN access also widen the attack surface if not managed carefully.
Document both current risks and emerging risks. A currently low-risk issue may become critical if the system grows, the data set changes, or a new regulation applies. That is why risk registers should be living documents, not annual snapshots.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is useful for thinking about attacker behavior and common techniques, especially when you want to connect observed threats to likely control gaps. It helps teams see beyond isolated alerts and understand patterns.
How Do You Assess and Score Risk?
Risk assessment is the process of estimating how likely a risk is to happen and how much damage it could cause. A good assessment is practical. It should help the business rank issues, not bury people in complexity.
The two most common dimensions are likelihood and impact. Likelihood asks how probable the event is. Impact asks what happens if it does occur. Impact should include downtime, data sensitivity, legal exposure, customer disruption, and financial loss. A system with no sensitive data and a long recovery window may be lower priority than a highly exposed customer portal even if both have technical weaknesses.
Qualitative scoring uses categories such as low, medium, and high. Quantitative analysis uses estimated dollar values, downtime hours, or probability percentages. Qualitative scoring is easier to start with and works well for most organizations. Quantitative methods are better when leadership needs more precise financial justification.
A risk matrix helps standardize scoring. For example, a high-likelihood/high-impact risk may be critical, while a low-likelihood/low-impact risk may be accepted or monitored. The matrix should be simple enough that different reviewers score similarly. If everyone interprets it differently, it stops being useful.
Context changes severity. A low-severity vulnerability on a public-facing payment system can be more urgent than a high-severity issue in a disconnected test environment.
When you score risk, document why the score was assigned. That explanation becomes essential during review, especially when leadership asks why one issue was prioritized over another.
How Do You Prioritize Risks That Matter Most?
Prioritization is where risk management becomes useful to the business. Not every risk can be fixed right away, and trying to do everything at once usually results in doing nothing well. Prioritize based on business criticality, exploitability, exposure, and the size of the potential loss.
Start with customer-facing systems, regulated data, and revenue-generating processes. Then look at risks that can spread quickly, such as identity compromise or backup failure. A vulnerability in a lab system is not usually urgent. The same issue on a domain controller or remote access gateway may be a top priority.
Balance quick wins and long-term work
Some risks are easy to reduce. Enabling multi-factor authentication, tightening admin access, or improving patch cadence may eliminate several high-value risks quickly. Other problems require longer-term remediation, such as replacing a legacy application or redesigning a business process. Good prioritization accounts for both.
A risk register or backlog keeps priorities visible over time. It should include the risk description, owner, score, treatment plan, due date, and current status. That gives leadership a clear view of what is improving and what is slipping.
- Prioritize first risks that threaten revenue, safety, compliance, or critical operations.
- Defer carefully issues that are low impact and low likelihood.
- Escalate immediately risks that involve active exploitation or exposed sensitive data.
- Track dependencies when one fix depends on another team, vendor, or budget cycle.
Prioritization should always answer one question: what action reduces the most business risk for the effort required?
How Do You Respond to IT Risk?
Risk response is the decision about what to do after a risk is identified and scored. The main options are mitigate, accept, transfer, avoid, and monitor. Each option is valid when used for the right reason and documented properly.
Mitigation means reducing likelihood or impact. Examples include patching vulnerable systems, segmenting networks, adding multi-factor authentication, tightening access control, improving backups, or increasing logging. These are the most common responses because they directly lower exposure.
Acceptance is appropriate when the cost of remediation is higher than the expected loss or when the issue is already within the organization’s tolerance. Acceptance should never be casual. It needs a named owner, rationale, approval, and review date.
Transfer shifts part of the financial or operational burden to another party. Cyber insurance, outsourcing, and contractual indemnities can help, but they do not remove the underlying risk. If the business still depends on the service, the risk still exists.
Avoidance means changing the process or eliminating the activity that creates the risk. Sometimes the safest option is to retire a legacy system or stop using a high-risk workflow. Monitoring is useful when the issue is currently acceptable but may worsen as systems, threats, or business priorities change.
Pro Tip
If a risk is accepted, write down who accepted it, what was known at the time, and when it will be reviewed again. That documentation protects the organization when priorities change later.
The best response is the one that reduces the most business exposure in the simplest sustainable way.
How Do You Design and Implement Controls?
Controls are safeguards that reduce risk. They usually fall into three categories: preventive, detective, and corrective. Preventive controls try to stop an incident before it starts. Detective controls find problems quickly. Corrective controls help restore service or reduce damage after something goes wrong.
Examples are easy to see in daily operations. Access management prevents unauthorized access. Patch management closes known weaknesses. Logging helps detect suspicious activity. Backups support recovery. Configuration hardening reduces the attack surface on servers, endpoints, and cloud resources.
Controls must be owned and tested
Control deployment is not enough. Someone must own the control, check whether it is working, and fix it if it drifts. A backup solution that has never been restored is a false sense of security. Logging that nobody reviews is just storage consumption. MFA that is partially deployed leaves gaps at the weakest accounts.
Test controls in the real environment. Restore a file from backup. Verify that privileged accounts require MFA. Confirm that alerting is routed to an active queue. Review cloud permissions for over-privileged roles. These checks prove whether the control actually reduces risk, not just whether it exists on paper.
| Control Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Preventive | Multi-factor authentication on remote access |
| Detective | SIEM alerts for suspicious login patterns |
| Corrective | Immutable backup restoration after ransomware |
Map each control to a specific risk. That keeps the program focused and prevents tool sprawl. If nobody can explain which risk a control reduces, it probably does not belong in the program.
How Do You Create a Risk Management Workflow?
A good workflow turns risk management into a repeatable process instead of a one-off exercise. The workflow should be simple enough that teams follow it consistently and structured enough that leadership can trust the results.
-
Intake the risk from a scan, incident, audit, vendor review, or stakeholder report. Capture a clear description, the affected asset, and the business process involved.
-
Assign ownership to the right business and technical contacts. One person should own the risk record, and one or more people should own remediation tasks.
-
Assess the risk using likelihood, impact, and context. Include data sensitivity, downtime tolerance, regulatory exposure, and customer impact.
-
Approve the response through the right authority. This may be a manager, a service owner, a steering group, or executive leadership depending on severity.
-
Track remediation in tickets, a risk register, or a project backlog. Include due dates, dependencies, and evidence of completion.
-
Reassess and close the risk only after controls are implemented and verified. Closure should be evidence-based, not assumption-based.
Service-level expectations help the workflow stay alive. For example, a critical risk may need review within five business days, while a lower-priority item may be reviewed monthly. The point is to keep the process moving without creating bureaucracy that teams ignore.
Tools can support the workflow, but they should not define it. A ticketing system, risk register, and dashboard are useful only if the process behind them is clear. The workflow is the program.
How Do You Monitor Risk on an Ongoing Basis?
Continuous monitoring is the practice of keeping risk information current after the initial assessment. Risk changes when threats change, when systems change, when business priorities change, or when controls drift. A once-a-year review is not enough for high-value environments.
Use inputs from security alerts, patch reports, backup test results, vendor notices, audit findings, and incident trends. If a vendor changes its hosting model or a cloud service updates its shared responsibility terms, the risk profile changes. If a system becomes customer-facing, the impact increases. If a control begins failing, the risk score should change with it.
Recurring reviews are essential. Business owners can confirm whether the original impact assumptions still hold. Technical owners can confirm whether the mitigation still works. Compliance teams can flag changes in regulatory exposure. These reviews turn risk management into a living process rather than a stale document library.
Risk is dynamic. A good program assumes today’s score may be wrong next month and builds review into the process.
Trend tracking is where leadership gets value. If the number of critical risks is falling, controls may be working. If overdue remediation is rising, the program needs attention. If the same kinds of findings keep appearing, that points to a systemic weakness, not just isolated mistakes.
For operational maturity, many teams also align monitoring with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency guidance on current threats and resilience practices.
How Do You Report IT Risk to Leadership?
Leadership does not need a list of technical findings. It needs a clear picture of business exposure and what decisions are required. Reporting should translate risk into downtime, financial impact, compliance implications, and customer consequences.
A useful executive summary answers four questions: What are the top risks? What is the business impact? What is being done about them? What decisions are needed now? That format keeps reporting concise and decision-oriented. It also helps leaders focus on exceptions rather than drowning in detail.
Use dashboards and trend reports
Heat maps, open-risk counts, overdue remediation totals, and control effectiveness trends work well for leadership audiences. They show whether the program is improving. They also make it easier to spot repeat issues, such as chronic patch delays or recurring vendor risk problems.
When reporting, avoid technical jargon unless it supports the decision. Say “customer portal outage could interrupt online sales for up to six hours” rather than “service availability is degraded due to upstream dependency risk.” Clear language gets faster action.
The COBIT governance model and the AICPA SOC reporting guidance are useful references when stakeholders expect evidence of control design, operating effectiveness, or auditability. They help frame risk reporting in terms leaders and auditors both understand.
What Are the Common Mistakes That Weaken Risk Programs?
Most weak programs fail for predictable reasons. The first mistake is treating risk management like a checklist. A one-time assessment creates paperwork, not resilience. The second mistake is focusing only on vulnerabilities without business context. That creates noise and wastes remediation effort.
Another common failure is poor ownership. If no one is accountable for a risk, it will remain open far longer than it should. The same problem shows up when remediation is handed off without follow-up. Tracking the issue is not the same as fixing it.
Third-party and cloud risk are also easy to ignore because they sit outside traditional infrastructure boundaries. That is a mistake. Many critical services now depend on vendors, SaaS tools, identity platforms, and cloud infrastructure. If those relationships are not in scope, the program misses major exposure.
Overcomplicated scoring models can also break the program. If the matrix has too many categories or requires too much math, teams stop using it. Simplicity improves consistency. Consistency improves trust.
- Avoid checklist thinking; risk management must stay active.
- Use business context; technical severity alone is not enough.
- Assign real owners; unresolved risk usually follows unclear accountability.
- Include third parties; vendor failures can become your business problem.
- Keep scoring simple; a model people ignore has no value.
Programs improve when they are designed for actual use, not theoretical perfection.
What Practical Tools and Artifacts Should You Build?
The right artifacts make risk management easier to run and easier to explain. You do not need a giant GRC platform to start. A few well-maintained documents or dashboards can support a strong program if they are current and owned.
A risk register is the core artifact. It should include the risk description, asset, owner, score, treatment plan, due date, status, and review date. An asset inventory helps you know what is being protected. A risk matrix standardizes how risks are prioritized. A control catalog documents which safeguards exist and who owns them. An executive dashboard summarizes the top trends for leadership.
These artifacts work together. The inventory tells you what exists. The register tells you what could go wrong. The matrix tells you what matters most. The catalog tells you what controls are in place. The dashboard tells leadership whether the program is improving.
For teams building skills in this area, a structured risk course such as the PMI-RMP-focused material offered by ITU Online IT Training can help learners connect project-level risk thinking to enterprise IT risk management. That matters because many risks cut across projects, operations, vendors, and change initiatives.
| Artifact | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Risk register | Track risks, owners, scores, and dates |
| Asset inventory | Identify what must be protected |
| Risk matrix | Rank risks consistently |
| Control catalog | Document safeguards and responsibility |
| Executive dashboard | Show trends and decision points |
Prerequisites
Before you build or improve a risk management program, get the basics in place. Without them, the workflow becomes subjective and difficult to sustain.
- A current asset inventory for systems, applications, cloud services, and sensitive data.
- Named business owners for key services and processes.
- Basic vulnerability and incident data from scans, logs, audits, and support tickets.
- Access to leadership or a steering group that can approve risk decisions.
- A simple tracking method such as a spreadsheet, ticket system, or risk register.
- Reference guidance from NIST, ISO/IEC 27001, or similar governance models.
If you do not have all of these yet, start anyway. A small but consistent program beats a perfect program that never launches.
How to Verify It Worked
You know the program is working when risk decisions become clearer, faster, and better documented. Verification is not just about whether a spreadsheet exists. It is about whether the workflow improves business outcomes.
-
Check the risk register for complete records. Each item should have an owner, score, treatment plan, and review date.
-
Review closure evidence for remediated risks. Patch reports, access reviews, backup restore tests, and configuration screenshots should support closure.
-
Look for overdue items and confirm they are being escalated. A healthy program does not let critical risks sit untouched.
-
Test a control in the real environment. For example, restore a backup or confirm MFA enforcement on an admin account.
-
Ask leaders what changed after the last report. If the report did not lead to a decision, it may need better framing.
Common failure symptoms include repeat findings, stale scores, missing owners, and reports that never change. If the same top risks appear month after month with no action, the program is not functioning as a decision-making process.
The CISA and NIST resources are useful for checking whether your controls and monitoring approach still align with current expectations.
Key Takeaway
- IT risk management is a business discipline that helps leaders decide where to spend time and money.
- Risk scope should include critical systems, data, cloud services, remote access, and third parties.
- Good scoring depends on likelihood, impact, and business context, not technical severity alone.
- Strong programs assign ownership, document response choices, and verify control effectiveness.
- Continuous monitoring keeps risk current as systems, threats, and priorities change.
FAQs About IT Risk Management
What is the difference between IT risk and cybersecurity risk?
IT risk covers any technology-related risk that can affect the business, including outages, data loss, vendor failure, and configuration issues. Cybersecurity risk is a subset focused on malicious or unauthorized activity such as phishing, malware, credential theft, and exploitation. In practice, the two overlap heavily, which is why many programs manage them together.
How often should a risk assessment be updated?
A risk assessment should be updated whenever the business changes, the threat environment changes, or a control fails. For critical systems, that may mean continuous review or monthly updates. For lower-risk services, quarterly or semiannual review may be enough. The right cadence depends on the service’s importance and volatility.
What should be included in a risk register?
A useful risk register should include the risk description, asset or process affected, likelihood, impact, score, owner, treatment plan, target date, status, and review history. If you can tie the risk to a business consequence such as downtime, compliance exposure, or revenue loss, the register becomes much more useful to leadership.
How do you decide whether to accept or mitigate a risk?
Accept a risk when the expected loss is low enough, the control cost is too high, or the organization has explicitly chosen to live with the exposure. Mitigate a risk when the potential impact is too large, the likelihood is high, or the issue affects critical systems or regulated data. The decision should be documented and approved by the right owner.
Which frameworks are most useful for organizing an IT risk program?
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework is one of the most practical starting points because it is readable and flexible. The NIST SP 800 series adds detailed control guidance. COBIT is useful for governance and reporting, especially in larger organizations.
References
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework
- NIST SP 800 Publications
- IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- COBIT
Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)
Discover essential risk management skills to identify, assess, and mitigate project risks early, ensuring project success and avoiding costly surprises
View Course →Conclusion
Effective IT risk management is not about eliminating every threat. It is about making informed business decisions, documenting them clearly, and revisiting them as conditions change. That is what separates a mature risk management program from a pile of disconnected findings.
Start with scope. Identify the systems, data, vendors, and business processes that matter most. Then build a repeatable workflow for identifying risks, assessing impact, choosing a response, and monitoring results. Add ownership and leadership reporting, and the program becomes useful instead of theoretical.
If you want to strengthen these skills further, the PMI-RMP-focused training context from ITU Online IT Training is a good fit for learning how to think about risk in a structured, business-first way. The better your program becomes, the better your organization can protect uptime, compliance, revenue, and reputation.
CompTIA®, Cisco®, Microsoft®, AWS®, EC-Council®, ISC2®, ISACA®, and PMI® are trademarks of their respective owners.
